DOWNLOAD Season 6 on iTUNES, AMAZON, GOOGLE PLAY and YOUTUBE MOVIES!
WHERE THE BEARS ARE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are also available on VIMEO ON DEMAND!
Our Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Eve, Mother's Day and 4th of July and Valentine's Day Specials are also available on VIMEO ON DEMAND!
BUY UNCENSORED DVD's of all seasons at: http://wherethebearsare.acmeprints.com/featured/
BUY MERCHANDISE at: http://wherethebearsare.acmeprints.com/featured
FOLLOW US at https://www.facebook.com/WhereTheBearsAre/ and https://twitter.com/WhereTheBearsR
THIS SERIES IS INTENDED FOR MATURE AUDIENCES!
WHERE THE BEARS ARE is a web series following the exploits of 3 bear roommates sharing a house in the hills of Silverlake. It is "The Golden Girls" meets "Murder She Wrote" with big, hairy, gay men.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO THIS CHANNEL! (Thank you:)
A nasty guest star on Law & Order: Male Rape Unit continues to cyber bully Nelson (Ben Zook), a flirtatious Middle Eastern prince (Chris Yonan) buys the Inquisitive Channel and sets his sights on Reggie, Todd is sexually harrassed by a co-worker at the International Security Agency, and Wood decides to start a Sporting Wood porn division. Reggie: Rick Copp. Wood: Joe Dietl. Todd: Ian Parks. Cyril: Scott Beauchemin. Coley: Tim Hooper. George: George Sebastian. Heath: E. Levi Allen. Rami: Serdar Kalsin. Body by Chuck: Chuck Villano. Kenny Kim: Shane Yoon. Alan Jones: Deon Sams. Scott Hubbard: Dan Wachtel. Hooper: John Moamar. Dooley: Shane Wiley. Eddie: John Skelton.
I have a big question. On Season 5 Episode 3, Nelson found out Todd's having an affair. On Season 6 Episode 2 or 3, Todd and Nelson are fine. There's no episodes how they got back together. Please help me. So confused.
All of the superficial physical attributes of intense masculinity are meaningless when that male's speech and behavior are effeminate. Sadly, this is most males who participate in the gay "culture." Over time they become silly, superficial and emasculated, exchanging their autonomy and manhood in favor of "fitting in" with the political "thought collective." Would you classify those males as MEN? They're all bearded ladies.
I love that Todd told Hooper that it wasn't any of his business as far as the sexual roles in his relationship with Nelson. I love that this was addressed because it's one of my biggest pet peeves within the gay community. I think it's bullsh*t when I'm made to feel like a prude because I don't feel comfortable discussing the sexual details between me and my husband with anyone else. Bravo guys. I don't know how intentional it was, but it definitely struck a chord with me.
Damn. I was really hoping Todd would put that homophobic prick co-worker in check with some snappy comeback after hearing those offensive remarks. Oh, well. Would love to see him and Heath in a sex scene together, even though I like Nelson and Heath is a jerk, lol. Can't wait to see the non-blurred ass on the DVD :)
rickcopp oh of course not judging, never have and never will... I love this show and have watched all previous seasons.... and I appreciate your kind words and feelings.. thanks a lot and can't wait to watch the rest of this season.. hugs
At 1:57 I can't believe how Reggie treats that poor make-up artist, this is awful, but I'm not surprised, unfortunately. That's not the first time and I'm pretty sure, not the last time either... :-D As with episode 1, I'll be posting behind the scenes pictures and comments from the season 6 shoot on my ig @pgremeau, with tags #wherethebearsare and #WTBA6
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.