Learn fun fascinating secrets of Magic Toys and Gadgets! In this How To Magic show, Evan Era explores magic toys that will blow your mind! Amazing magic toys for kids, cool new tech gadgets put to the test and more! Join us for this kid-friendly magic toy review and get an education in becoming a magician the fun way - with toys!
Subscribe here ► http://bit.ly/SubToEvan
If you're new to our channel remember to hit that subscribe button and welcome to the family! Remember that anything is possible as long as you stay positive, work hard, and [email protected] my friends! :)
Magic Shop here ► http://www.EvanEraTV.com
Send Mail To
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014 USA
[email protected] Merch ► http://www.ShopLaughAtLife.com
EMAIL: [email protected]
Follow Evan Era:
Facebook ► https://facebook.com/EvanEraTV
Instagram ► https://instagram.com/EvanRosenman
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/evnera
Snapchat ► http://bit.ly/SnapchatEvan
Magic Toys & Gadgets Reviewed in this Video:
Light Up LED Spinning Ribbon Bubble Magic Wand
Fidget Stick Spinning on Escalator Trick
Disappearing Scarf Magic Box Revealed
Magic Flame LED Lightbulb Fire Illusion
Wooden Light Up Magic Book Lamp
Funny Magic Pop Up Tie Prank Revealed
Illuminated Apparel Glow in the Dark Shirt Gadget
The Magic Dancing Coke Can Toy
Floating Ball Levitation Trick Toy Magic Challenge
GOOD LUCK in the FREE TOYS GIVEAWAY!!
More Magic Tricks Here:
On this channel we make fun, family-friendly, educational content in the form of magic, pranks, vlogs, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.