In this episode of How To Magic, Evan Era from EvanEraTV shows 7 Easy Magic Tricks with a Magic Fake Thumb Tip! A bunch of cool gimmick plastic thumb tips for different amazing magic tricks! Step by step instructions for each magic trick tutorial with all secrets revealed! Perfect magic tricks for kids, fun for the whole family! You'll be doing tricks like a real magician in no time! If you're new to the channel be sure to hit the SUBSCRIBE button and welcome to the family! If you need a magic thumb be sure to head over to the online shop and grab one today before we sell out! Thanks for all the love and support #eraSQUAD!
SHOP HERE → http://www.EvanEraTV.com
SEND MAIL TO:
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014
MY VLOGS - http://bit.ly/EvanVlogs
EMAIL - [email protected]
Magic Tricks Revealed in this Video:
1.) Lighter Flame Thumb Tip Fire Trick Revealed - 0:33
2.) How To Magic Thumb Tip Rainbow Streamer - 2:02
3.) Suction Cup Levitation Magic Thumb Tip Float - 4:25
4.) Magic Balloon Pop Trick Thumbtack Thumb - 5:28
5.) Impossible Playing Card Spin on Finger Trick - 5:48
6.) How To Magic Bleeding Fake Blood Thumb Trick - 6:44
7.) Fire Ball Bare Hands Fireball Magic Trick Revealed - 8:28
Bonus: Magic Mind Reading Boon Writer Pencil Thumb - 9:28
GOOD LUCK in the FREE Magic Thumb Tips GIVEAWAY!!
More Magic Tricks Here: http://bit.ly/2fINoNQ
#EvanEra #EvanEraTV #HowToMagic #eraSQUAD #LaughAtLife [email protected]
This channel provides awesome content in the form of magic, pranks, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
I'd like to say this video is good or best I've been hunting watermelon in the wild for at least 15 years now, and have never seen more than 2 watermelons lined up in a row. I heard a story of a guy who went hunting wild watermelons and found 3 in a perfect line, but I found that hard to believe.These watermelons were either tamed or trained, or sedated and slaughtered for fun. It's sad either way.
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.