GET MERCH: http://www.EvanEraTV.com
In this Magic Pranks episode of How To Magic, Evan Era from EvanEraTV shows 7 Easy To Do Magic Pranks with Computers! Easy how to magic tricks and magic pranks with your computer! Family fun magic gags, jokes, and hacks to prank your friends and family! Perfect for beginners, laid out with step by step instructions for each trick explanation, these magic tricks and pranks can be used on a Windows PC or an iMac, Macbook laptop, some can even apply to an iPad or other tablets, iPhone, Android smartphones, and other electronics like a TV :) have fun with these magic pranks and good luck on the Hoverboard Segway Giveaway! Be sure to share on Facebook and Twitter using the hashtag #EvanEraTV :) thanks for all the amazing love and support #eraSQUAD // The EvanEraTV Shop is launching this Saturday October 1, 2016!!! So excited!!! Thank you all for making How To Magic the Best Magic Show on the Internet! :) Stay positive and [email protected] my friends! [email protected]
MY VLOGS: http://bit.ly/EvanVlogs
CARD TO COMPUTER SCREEN VIDEO: http://bit.ly/2d9Wroj
SCARY HAUNTED COMPUTER VIDEO: http://bit.ly/2cP9pYT
SEND MAIL TO:
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014
EMAIL: [email protected]
Magic Computer Pranks Revealed in this Video:
1.) Playing Card Thru Computer Screen Trick Revealed - 0:44
2.) Magic Broken Mouse Tape Over Censor Magic Prank - 2:44
3.) Secret Magic Frozen Desktop Icons PC Prank - 3:15
4.) Scary Ghost Scream Computer Scare Prank - 4:40
5.) Fake Update Computer Hacker Crash Prank - 5:31
6.) Funny Google Gravity Search Tricks and Pranks - 6:13
7.) Broken Computer Screen Magic Prank Revealed - 7:07
GOOD LUCK in the FREE Hoverboard Segway GIVEAWAY!!!
Giveaway Winner Requirements:
1.) Comment on this video
2.) Thumbs up this video
3.) Subscribe to EvanEraTV YouTube Channel
4.) Subscribe to EvanEraVLogs YouTube Channel
5.) Share at least 1 video hyperlink from EvanEraTV YouTube Channel on your personal Facebook or Twitter using the hashtag #EvanEraTV
Giveaway Official Rules:
Entries that do not comply will be disqualified. YouTube is not a sponsor of this contest. YouTube is also free from any and all liability related to this contest. Link to YouTube community guidelines: https://www.youtube.com/yt/policyandsafety/communityguidelines.html
Giveaway Privacy Notice: Any personal data collected for the contest will not be sold or used for any commercial purpose. Your stuff is safe with us.
*Contest Ends & Winner Drawing at Midnight EST on November 1, 2016*
More Magic Pranks Here: http://bit.ly/2dyAjXr
#EvanEra #EvanEraTV #HowToMagic #eraSQUAD #LaughAtLife [email protected]
This channel provides awesome content in the form of magic, pranks, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.