I didn't think things in WaterColor, Florida could get any more blissful...until I ran across Mint Julep–an aptly named vacation rental brimming with seaside style! The atmosphere is refreshing, calming and comfortable, thanks to Jennifer Taylor Design who recently gave the dreamy beach house a 'refresh'! I absolutely adore the coastal-inspired color palette and fantastic use of natural texture. The open-concept main floor, ceiling in the game room and all three of the cozy porches are fabulous too! (So many places to drink my coffee!) Possibly the nicest feature isn't even shown...a private pool and hot tub are being added as I type! See more pics and get all the rental info here!
More Videos: #tinyhouse #tinyhouses #smallhouse #cottage #cabin #tiny #tinyhome
#TinyHouseLover is a channel sharing homes under 500 sq ft. In the past few years, #tiny homes have surged in popularity. They're economical, environmentally friendly, and encourage people to live minimally.
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.