Check out Express' amazing jeans here:https://bit.ly/2MyMHDD
Thank you to Express for sponsoring this video!
Items worn in this video:
Check out the WORLD'S BEST T-shirts: https://www.esntls.co/
Pick one up and let me know what you think!
Subscribe to our 2nd channel: http://bit.ly/2aOthqV
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Email: [email protected]
Our Address is:
10380 SW Village Center Dr., 240
Port St. Lucie, FL 34987
Music by: https://soundcloud.com/lakeyinspired & https://soundcloud.com/dyallas
It's a good to share your ways of wearing a same pair jeans everyday. Avantgard Exchange also having a large variety of clothes. That give a attractive look to you. We have a large number of styles, sizes with different brands. For getting visit us.
Really? The same jeans for seven days straight? This is the worst advice ever. Wearing the same jeans for about 10 hours a day, sweating, feeling hot, the outdoor elements i can keep going nasty. I don't want to be near you after day 3 with that awfull smell. I wear my jeans max 2 times and after that i wash them. Shirts i only wear 1 time before tossing it in the hamper. Nah man this is the worst and most unhygenic advice you have ever given. This sits there with your advice video on affordable cars you did with your brother. Sorry man.
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.