LAST EPISODE - https://youtu.be/2A8b96sfpNA
In this episode of How To Magic, Evan Era from EvanEraTV shows 10 Amazing Street Magic Tricks on the streets of New York City! Amazing and easy to do street magic tricks revealed with explanations for each trick! A CRAZY magic trick for a cop, cool magic card trick for kids, and everyone else in between! :) Filmed on the streets of NYC and Louisville, Kentucky - real people, real reactions, real magic secrets revealed! Thumbs up for more street magic tricks! Thanks for all the love and support #eraSQUAD! If you're new to the channel, smack that SUBSCRIBE button and welcome to the family :) stay positive and [email protected] my friends
MY VLOGS: http://bit.ly/EvanVlogs
SEND MAIL TO:
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014
EMAIL: [email protected]
LIKE on FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/EvanEraTV
ADD on FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/EvanEraRosenman
Street Magic Tricks Revealed in this Video:
1.) Magic Plastic Bottle Air Duster Liquid Nitrogen Trick - 0:52
2.) Metal Spoon Bend Street Magic Mind Power Trick - 2:07
3.) Amazing Magic Color Change Playing Card Trick - 3:11
4.) Disappearing Magic Milk Glass Cup of Milk Trick - 6:14
5.) Vanishing Deck of Playing Cards Street Magic Trick - 8:15
6.) Amazing Box of Cards Vanish Street Magic Trick - 8:45
7.) Lubor Lens Twisted Ink Pen Street Magic Trick - 10:49
8.) Street Magic Moving Pips Playing Card Trick - 12:52
9.) Scary Magic Haunted Moving Key Trick Revealed - 15:02
10.) Street Magic Zapped Royal Flush Poker Card Trick - 16:21
GOOD LUCK in the FREE Magic Tricks giveaway!
More Magic Tricks Here - http://bit.ly/2cFXJsh
#EvanEra #EvanEraTV #HowToMagic #eraSQUAD #LaughAtLife [email protected]
This channel provides awesome content in the form of magic, pranks, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.