How to Magic Around the World in a Snap! Evan Era travels around the world in less than a minute for this fun magic video! More than 10 international destinations all over the earth - London England • Paris France • Pisa Italy • Cairo Egypt • Beijing China • Sydney Australia • New York City • Los Angeles California • Grand Canyon Arizona • Las Vegas Nevada and Louisville Kentucky in the United States. This is an obvious camera trick; I don't have actually have the power to teleport around the world just by snapping by fingers... yet :) stay tuned for my 10 Magic Tricks Around the World video dropping this Wednesday July 25th 2018 (which is also my 32nd birthday; come celebrate with me!) right here on EvanEraTV! Thanks for watching!
Subscribe here ► http://bit.ly/SubToEvan
If you're new to our channel remember to hit that subscribe button and welcome to the family! Remember that anything is possible as long as you stay positive, work hard, and [email protected] my friends! :)
Magic Shop here ► http://www.EvanEraTV.com
Send Mail To
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014 USA
[email protected] Merch ► http://www.ShopLaughAtLife.com
EMAIL: [email protected]
Follow Evan Era:
Facebook ► https://facebook.com/EvanEraTV
Instagram ► https://instagram.com/EvanRosenman
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/evnera
Snapchat ► http://bit.ly/SnapchatEvan
On this channel we make fun, family-friendly content in the form of magic, pranks, vlogs, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
This Wednesday July 25th The World Premiere of 10 Magic Tricks Around The World here on EvanEraTV!!! also same
day is my 32nd birthday :) thanks for all the love on the channel here recently! new magic videos coming soon!!!
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.