Learn how to do 12 funny magic pranks for your next holiday party! In this How To Magic video, Evan Era shows Easy Magic Pranks for Christmas 2018! Easy magic party tricks for kids, beginners, and all ages! How To Carve An Ice Sculpture Using Magic and an Elon Musk Flamethrower! Magic Christmas Food Pranks, tricks with snowflakes, snowballs, Christmas Trees, Ornaments, Holiday Cookies, Gift Wrap and more! A quick magic glitter prank you can do and a tasty Egg Nog trick! Family-friendly magic prank tutorials with step by step instructions for each fun prank! Have some fun this Holiday season and give the gift of a good laugh! All magic secrets revealed!
Subscribe here ► http://bit.ly/SubToEvan
If you're new to our channel remember to hit that subscribe button and welcome to the family! Remember that anything is possible as long as you stay positive, work hard, and [email protected] my friends! :)
Magic Shop here ► http://www.EvanEraTV.com
Send Mail To
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014 USA
[email protected] Merch ► http://www.ShopLaughAtLife.com
Become a Member ► https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWZZowzfDwihJ8VbQ3H8ivw/join
EMAIL: [email protected]
Follow Evan Era:
Facebook ► https://facebook.com/EvanEraTV
Instagram ► https://instagram.com/EvanRosenman
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/evnera
Snapchat ► http://bit.ly/SnapchatEvan
Supplies You'll Need:
Candy Canes • Holiday Cookies • Christmas Ornaments • Christmas Tree • Playing Cards • Hot Chocolate • Mug • Wrapping Paper • Cardboard Box • Scissors • Tape • Glue • Ice Block • Flamethrower • Hair Dryer • Heat Gun • Glass Santa Claus • White Balloons • Snow • Paper • Edible Cake Glitter • Gelling Powder • Fruit Punch • Punch Bowl • Paper Streamers • Eggs • Egg Nog
Playing Card Cookie Cutters & Magic Paper Streamers available here: http://www.trendodo.com
Magic Tricks Revealed in this Video:
How To Carve An Ice Sculpture Using Magic Santa Prank
White Balloon Snowball Throw Fake Out Prank
Snowflake Cut Out Playing Card Reveal Party Trick
Funny Eating Christmas Glitter Magic Prank Revealed
Magic Self Stirring Mug of Hot Chocolate Trick
Gross Jelly Punch Bowl Holiday Party Prank
Magic Appearing Rainbow Paper Streamers Party Trick
Appearing Egg from Egg Nog Drink Trick
Amazing Christmas Cookie Cutters Card Trick
Funny Fake Bicycle Gift Wrap Prank
Playing Card to Christmas Tree Ornament Trick
GOOD LUCK in the FREE MAGIC TRICKS GIVEAWAY!!
More Magic Tricks Here: https://youtu.be/nWoEskeSc-4
On this channel we make fun, family-friendly content in the form of magic, pranks, vlogs, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
Happy Holidays from all of us :) be sure to check out http://www.EvanEraTV.com for all your magical merch!! Appreciate the tremendous love and support my friends... good luck in the magic giveaway! Much love & [email protected]
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.