Magic Tricks - http://www.EvanEraTV.com
Prank Gear - http://www.PrankKits.com
How To Prank - http://bit.ly/2msrT7h
Magic Tricks! In this episode of How To Magic, Evan Era from EvanEraTV teams up with Dennis Roady from howtoPRANKitup and shows 5 Dangerous Magic Tricks and Pranks! Super crazy magic tricks that could easily make this video titled "gone wrong!" but thankfully it didn't and no one got hurt! :) Some really fun magic trick tutorials and funny magic pranks in this one! All secrets revealed! If you're new to the channel remember to hit that SUBSCRIBE button and welcome to the family! Until next time, remember that anything is possible as long as you stay positive, work hard, and [email protected] my friends! :)
SUBSCRIBE - http://bit.ly/SubToEvan
MY VLOGS - http://bit.ly/EvanVlogs
SEND MAIL TO:
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014
EMAIL: [email protected]
Magic Tricks Revealed in this Video:
1.) Funny Fake Knife Thru Arm Magic Prank - 0:33
2.) How To Swallow A Sword Trick Revealed - 2:31
3.) Appearing Danger Cane of Death Trick - 4:14
4.) Magic Flame Coin Fire Change in Hand - 5:40
5.) Funny Broken Neck Crack Magic Prank - 7:30
Bonus: Fire in Palm of Hands Trick Revealed - 8:40
GOOD LUCK in the FREE DANGER TRICKS GIVEAWAY!!
More Magic Tricks Here: http://bit.ly/2lLs0pO
#EvanEra #EvanEraTV #HowToMagic #eraSQUAD #LaughAtLife [email protected]
This channel provides awesome content in the form of magic, pranks, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
DANGER!!! Teamed up with @DennisRoady for this one :) thanks for the love #eraSQUAD be sure to check out www.EvanEraTV.com and all the new gear! International shipping available now!! If you're new to the channel SUBSCRIBE and welcome to the family :) Until next time remember that anything is possible as long as you stay positive, work hard, and [email protected] my friends!!
I just want to tell you that is a prank hahaha just kidding I am projects project project I am the game master of project game master look it's just a prank I'm one of your fans been your friend since over a year and my mom is cool with it so please send it to me please please please please please I beg you I beg you please I really like you Channel Ethan my sister watch my mom my grandma every single body is it my dad my whole universe of my family watches it please please please give one away for me please and I made this paragraph for you to think that I am project game master Lexus is just a prank dude
Z hey I want to one of your magic stuff I know I didn't give it to me cuz you're white as hell you even look like a pan you stupid white piece of crap and I look ugly as hell I'll pop you right in your face you little brats no. That's not your trash even your garbage trash that's why you're here. I need some surgery because you are Donald Trump everything your body needs some surgery
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.