Get PEPPERED! and spice up your magic! This fun, modular routine is straight from Mark Zust's restaurant/corporate set and is available for the first time. Mark is a pro who's been performing at trade shows, restaurants, corporate hospitalities and on stage as a keynote speaker for more than 35 years. Peppered! is one of his favorite effects for walk-around.
Effect: That’s one pesky olive! It appears, disappears and reappears on the top of the pepper shaker, on the bottom, and yes, even INSIDE the sealed shaker. Finally, the little rascal grows to a JUMBO olive! The routine is designed so you can perform one or several phases, with patter or silently.
The PEPPERED! PRO SET includes a FIVE phase routine with script, performance rights, a detailed video e-tutorial, studio performance, PLUS extra moves, tips and ideas. Although not for the beginner, PEPPERED! requires simple moves that you most likely already know. The e-tutorial explains all the moves, misdirection and subtleties.
The PEPPERED! Shaker does most of the work for you!
Comes complete with gimmicked pepper shaker, three realistic small rubber olives, one jumbo olive, squeaker, Sharpie marker and comprehensive online video tutorial.
Retails for $69. Paypal to: [email protected]
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.