MY VLOGS: http://bit.ly/EvanVlogs
BEHIND THE SCENES: http://bit.ly/2ai45NV
Pokemon Go In Real Life Prank - Evan Era from EvanEraTV pranks the public with this epic Pokémon Go In Real Life Prank! Magic tricks with a pokéball, Real Life Pokeballs at a Pokestop, funny prank with a rare Mewtwo pokemon, a hatching pokémon egg, magic fire prank, and a giant Pikachu costume! Pikachu rides a hoverboard, gets hit with a pokéball, and scares a couple people in an elevator prank hahaha. We surprise the kids with family fun Pokemon Prank in the beginning of the video, and plenty of cool Pokemon toys too! Its like the cartoon In Real Life! The big pikachu costume was fun but extremely hot in the summer sun lol the family had a lot of fun with it :) Thanks for all the love on this Pokemon Go Prank video - we put a lot of hard work and effort into it! Be safe playing the Pokémon Go game out there, hope you Catch 'Em All and Laugh At Life my friends! :) thanks for sharing! [email protected]
SEND MAIL TO:
PO BOX 943
Crestwood KY 40014
EMAIL: [email protected]
GOOD LUCK in the FREE Pokémon Go Real Life Pokéball GIVEAWAY!
More Pranks Here: http://bit.ly/29Y53ug
Disco Sting by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
#EvanEra #EvanEraTV #HowToMagic #eraSQUAD #LaughAtLife [email protected]
Special Thanks to Sasha Caufield, Eric Williams, Zach Craig, and Veronica Smith for all the amazing help with this video!
This channel provides awesome content in the form of magic, pranks, and other cool videos - SUBSCRIBE for weekly uploads!! :)
More Videos Here: http://www.youtube.com/EvanEraTV
Pikachu ate my dog the other day then charizard killed pikachu my dog wasn't inside if pikachu it was iinside zubat. Now I hate zubat and I breed to save my dog rockruff. So I take zubat
And wrap it with balbasurs vine whip. Mewtwo comes and gives me my rockruff me confused when I'm almost killing this zubat. Then pikachu comes out of charizard and gives me a rockruff. Then zubat gives me a rockruff. I traded all the rockruffs
To isolate the mobilization-induced labor supply shift, the authors exploit the fact that the fraction of males serving in the war was not uniform across states. For example, in Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah, almost 55 percent of males between the ages of 18 and 44 left civilian work to serve in the war. In Georgia, the Dakotas, and the Carolinas, this number ranged between 40 and 45 percent. The state differences in war mobilization actually reflect a variety of factors. The Selective Services guidelines for deferments were based on marital status, fatherhood, essential skills for civilian war production, and temporary medical disabilities, but left considerable discretion to the local boards. Because of the importance of maintaining a strong food supply to support the war, an important consideration for deferment was farm employment.
States with a high percentage of farmers had substantially lower mobilization rates, and this explains a considerable share of the state variation in mobilization rates.
The authors show that in states with greater war mobilization of men, women worked more after the war and in 1950, but not in 1940. This differential does not appear to be explained by other cross-state differences or possible demand factors, and is not present in the 1940 data nor does a similar trend recur in the decade of the 1950s. The authors interpret these differentials as labor supply shifts induced by the War. Acemoglu, Autor, and Lyle believe these cross-state changes in female employment were caused by greater participation of women during the war years, with some of those women staying on. War changed womens preferences, opportunities, and information about available work.